[問卦] 若有天軍警殺你家人卻又免受罰時，你會?

先聲明，我認為現代社會的衝突99.999%都可以用和平理性的討論方式來解決
但請想想：如果當某天你辛苦工作繳稅所養的軍警，把你的家人當畜牲隨意宰殺時
你是選擇：「和平理性」的抗爭? 還是「對等報復」對方的家人呢?
First, of all, I believe 99.999% of conflicts in modern society can be
resolved through peaceful and rational discussions.
But think about it：If one day the military and police who raised by those
hard-worked taxpayers like you.
And they slaughtering your family like slaughtering animals as their will.
What will you do? Struggle with 「Peace and rational」? Or swore to revenge
their family members?

----------------------------------

漢摩拉比法典可說是現代人類文明的基石之一，其主張：
「以牙還牙，以眼還眼」的對等報復精神
使潛在惡意者為了避免遭到同樣的報復，而放棄實施傷害別人的行為
例如漢摩拉比法典中便規定：「若一位泥水匠蓋了房子若倒塌壓死了人，即應處以死刑」如此一來，便能確保泥水匠蓋屋時不會偷工減料，全民也能居住到安全的房屋。
此法典促進了現代最初的契約精神，與法學思想的發展。
Code of Hammurabi is a cornerstone of modern human civilization.
Proposition：spirit of reciprocal revenge of 「a tooth for a tooth, an eye
for an eye」
In order to avoid the same retaliation, those potential malicious people willabandon their harmful behavior.
For example. In Code of Hammurabi says：If a plasterer built a house and
crushed people to death, he should be sentenced to death.
In this way, ensured that the plasterers will not cut corners when building
houses. All people can live in safe houses.
This code promoted the original contract spirit in modern times and the
development of legal thought.

這觀念也影響了後來的「聖經。舊約」，例如在出埃及記 21章23~25條所云
第23條：若有別害，就要以命償命，
第24條：以眼還眼，以牙還牙，以手還手，以腳還腳，
第25條：以烙還烙，以傷還傷，以打還打。
第28條：牛若觸死男人或是女人，總要用石頭打死那牛，卻不可吃它的肉，牛的主人
可算無罪。
第29條：倘若那牛素來是觸人的，有人報告了牛主，他竟不把牛拴著，以致把男人或
是女人觸死，就要用石頭打死那牛，牛主也必治死
第30條：若罰他贖命的價銀，他必照所罰的贖他的命。

後成為近代文明的契約、法律與外交基本精神，
例如：「平等互惠，比例原則，對等報復」
更演變成現代各國量刑與賠償比例標準，可說是現代法治文明逐漸進步的核心思想。
This concept also influenced the later "Bible. Old Testament", for example,
as stated in Exodus 21: 23-25
Article 23：But if there is serious injury, you are to take life for life,
Article 24：Eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot,
Article 25：Burn for burn, wound for wound, bruise for bruise.
Article 28：If a bull gores a man or a woman to death, the bull must be
stoned to death, and its meat must not be eaten.
But the owner of the bull will not be held responsible.
Article 29：If, however, the bull has had the habit of goring and the owner
has been warned but has not kept it penned up and it kills a man
or woman,the bull must be stoned and the owner also must be put
to death.
Article 30：However, if payment is demanded of him, he may redeem his life by paying whatever is demanded.
Later, It became the basic spirit of the contract, law, and diplomacy
in modern civilization, Such as：「Equality and reciprocity, Principle of proportionality, and equal
retaliation.」
It has evolved into the standard of sentencing and compensation ratios in
modern countries, which can be said to be the basic core idea of the gradual progress of modern
rule of law civilization.


而「為虎作倀」與「動物農莊」的故事，我想大家都耳熟能詳了。
請問你覺得：
1.為虎作倀的「倀」，是不是很可惡，該下十八層地獄呢?
2.為了幫豬獲得利益，而對其他動物施加暴力的狗，是不是很可惡，該下十八層地獄呢?如果你都答「是，他們都該下地獄」，那我便恭喜你，你是一個有思考能力的現代「人」，而不是現代「奴隸」。
因為「人與人」之間便是適用：平等互惠、比例原則，對等報復。
但「人與奴隸」之間，並不適用這些原則，而是略施輕懲，或僅要求「人」賠償
其目的並非是保障奴隸的生命安全，
而是為了讓奴隸持續活著，繼續創造產值，好為「人」繼續服務。
我們再次用「聖經。舊約」為例。
第26條：人若打壞了他奴僕或是婢女的一隻眼，就要因他的眼放他去得以自由。
第27條：若打掉了他奴僕或是婢女的一個牙，就要因他的牙放他去得以自由。”
第32條：牛若觸了奴僕或婢女，必將銀子三十舍客勒給他們的主人，也要用石頭把牛打死看出來「人與人」及「人與奴僕」的差別待遇了嗎?

I think everyone is familiar with the story of "Hold a candle to the devil"
and "Animal Farm".
What do you think：
1.Shouldn't we send those evil people who hold a candle for the devil to hell?2.Shouldn't we send those dogs who harm other animals for their own interest
to hell?
If all your answers are「Yes, they should all go to hell.」
Then I congratulate you, you are a modern「people」with thinking ability, nota modern 「slave」
Because 「people」 are applicable：Equality and reciprocity, Principle of
proportionality, and equal retaliation.
However, these principles do not apply between 「people and slaves」.
Instead, 「people」 will be slightly punished or demand compensation if they
harm 「slave」.
The purpose is not to protect the life of the slaves, but to keep the slaves
alive, So they can keep serving the「people」
We Use the "Bible. Old Testament" for example again.
Article 26：If a man hits a manservant or maidservant in the eye and destroysit, he must let the servant go free to compensate for the eye
Article 27：And if he knocks out the tooth of a manservant or maidservant, hemust let the servant go free to compensate for the tooth.
Article 32：If the bull gores a male or female slave, the owner must pay
thirty shekels of silver to the master of the slave, and the bull must be
stoned.
Can you see the difference treatment between 「people and people」and
「people and slaves」?

我們再進入下一個問題，在一個國家或政府中，
人渣狗官正不擇手段強取豪奪人民的權利、生命與財產。
而狗官所眷養的走狗們則為了官位與金錢，毫不留情的屠殺人民。
想請問各位，你覺得：人渣狗官與他們的走狗們，是否該下十八層地獄呢?
大概只有：人渣狗官與他們的走狗，及其家屬們，會不同意他們該下十八層地獄吧?
再看現實世界正在發生的現況
1.港共政府的高官，與港共黑警們，正在毫不手軟的鎮壓屠殺人民。
2.緬甸軍政府高層，與緬甸軍警們，正在毫不手軟的鎮壓屠殺人民
你覺得這些人是否都該下十八層地獄呢?
如果你認為「是」，那是不是該改變抗爭手段了呢?

Let's move on to the next question, in a country or government,
The scumbag officers are unscrupulously taking the rights, lives, and
property of the people by force.
And those lackeys who paid by the unscrupulous officer, Keeping their
position and wages by merciless killing 「people」
Shouldn't we send them all to hell?
Probably only：scumbag officer, their lackeys, and their families will
disagOAree with that.
And look around what the hell is happening now.
1.Hongkong communist party officers and their lackeys are killing 「people」
with mercilessness.
2.Burmese military government officers and their lackeys are killing 「people」with mercilessness.
Shouldn't we send them all to hell?
If you agree with this. Then It is time to change the way of resistance.

為什麼要去和平示威，去到街上遭受掃射屠殺呢?
為什麼得要集合遊行，被當畜生打到頭破血流呢?
為什麼要用劣質裝備，去對抗用你繳納的稅金，全面武裝的軍警走狗呢?
而認為這些抗爭方法有效的人，要嘛是白癡，要嘛就是狗官安插的內奸。
Why go to peaceful demonstrations on the streets and then slaughtered like
animals?
Why gather and group up for a parade and then be bloody beaten like animals?
Why use inferior equipment to fight against those fully armed lackeys who areusing your hard-work taxes?
Those leaders who think these methods of resistance are effective are either
idiots or hidden traitors planted by scumbag officers.

還記得上述的：「平等互惠，比例原則，對等報復」嗎?
當狗官與走狗屠殺你的家人時，你該怎麼伸張天理與正義呢?
因此真正有效的唯一做法，便是鎖定狗官與走狗們的家屬下手，
將他們的父母、配偶、子女通通殺掉。
而當狗官與走狗們，會害怕自己的家人因為他們的暴行受到報復時，
則他們的暴行不就會因此停止了嗎?
我相信只要是大腦正常的「人」，都能理解「平等互惠，比例原則，對等報復」
至於那些正受到屠殺卻不知反抗，還要保護狗官們家人生命財產的奴隸們，
他們活該去死。
Remember those:「Equality and reciprocity, Principle of proportionality, and
equal retaliation.」 which just mentioned before?
How can you get rightness and justice when scumbag officers and their lackeyskilling your family?
The only true to end this mess. Is aiming and killing all their families.
E.g. their parents, spouse, children.
When scumbag officers and their lackeys are terrified by what will going to
happen on their families.
Then they will stop the killing for avoiding the consequence.
I believe that every 「 people」with general knowledge can understand
「Equality and reciprocity,Principle of proportionality, and equal retaliation.」
For those 「slaves」 who are being slaughtered without any resistance. and
still want to protect the lives and property of the dog officials
THEY DESERVE TO DIE.

最後，希望緬甸人與香港人能真正的覺醒，放棄華而不實的和平抗議
全面撲殺緬甸與香港所有的官員、警察、軍人，以及他們的家屬，
才能讓你們從「奴僕」變成「人」
而死不足惜的狗官，都是犯下屠殺罪與反人類罪的共犯，死不足惜且該下十八層地獄。
Finally, I hope that the Burmese and Hong Kong people can truly awaken and
Give up the insubstantial peaceful protests.
Completely killing all the officials, police, soldiers, and their families inMyanmar and Hong Kong.
This will turn you from 「slave」into 「people」.
And scumbag officers and their lackeys who crimes of massacre and against
humanity.
Deserved get a one-way ticket to hell with their families.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
版權沒有，轉載不究
不服來辯，真理自明

No copyright, you can resend if you are willing to.
If you don't agree with me. truth comes from the debate.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

--

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.253.41.112 (臺灣)