PTT推薦

[情報] ESPN選出MLB各隊近51年最破守位

看板MLB標題[情報] ESPN選出MLB各隊近51年最破守位作者
zxc906383
(無無)
時間推噓12 推:12 噓:0 →:8

ESPN選出MLB各隊近51年最破守位

Sore spots: The one position that most haunts all 30 MLB teams
https://www.espn.com/mlb/insider/story/_/id/31296037/sore-spots-one-position-most-haunts-all-30-mlb-teams


註:
(1)看內文hole score是用來衡量各守位破洞程度+持續時間,分數越高代表越破
(2)連兩年這守位高於平均的話則設為green


話說這樣看這52年來銀河躲真的沒破洞欸XD




1969-2020


以下按破洞程度排名
越前面代表越破


1. Chicago Cubs
Position: Center field (hole score: 38)
Last green: Never (0% green since 1969)


2. Pittsburgh Pirates
Position: Right field (hole score: 35)
Last green: 1991 (25% green since 1969)


3. Washington Nationals
Position: Catcher (hole score: 33)
Last green: 1984 (15% green since 1969)


4. San Diego Padres
Position: Starting pitchers (hole score: 32)
Last green: 1998 (17% green since 1969)


5. Colorado Rockies
Position: Catcher (hole score: 24)
Last green: Never (0% green since 1969)
.

6. Miami Marlins
Position: First base (hole score: 23)
Last green: Never (0% green since 1969)


7. Kansas City Royals
Position: Right field (hole score: 22)
Last green: 2000 (2% green since 1969)

8. Philadelphia Phillies
Position: Third base (hole score: 21)
Last green: 2004 (46% green since 1969)


9. Houston Astros
Position: Catcher (hole score: 21)
Last green: 1971 (4% green since 1969)


10. Detroit Tigers
Position: Relief pitchers (hole score: 18)
Last green: 1990 (29% green since 1969)


11. Arizona Diamondbacks
Position: Relief pitchers (hole score: 17)
Last green: 2003 (13% green since 1969)


12. Tampa Bay Rays
Position: Catcher (hole score: 17)
Last green: 1999 (4% green since 1969)


13. San Francisco Giants
Position: Center field (hole score: 15)
Last green: 1991 (20% green since 1969)


14. Chicago White Sox
Position: Center field (hole score: 14)
Last green: 2005 (23% green since 1969)


15. New York Mets
Position: Catcher (hole score: 14)
Last green: 2003 (37% green since 1969)


16. Milwaukee Brewers
Position: Shortstop (hole score: 13)
Last green: 2009 (29% green since 1969)
whether he pans out.


17. Texas Rangers
Position: First base (hole score: 13)
Last green: 2007 (60% green since 1969)


18. Seattle Mariners
Position: 1B (hole score: 13)
Last green: 2006 (16% green since 1969)


19. Cincinnati Reds
Position: Center field (hole score: 11)
Last green: 2005 (35% green since 1969)


20. Baltimore Orioles
Position: Starting pitchers (hole score: 11)
Last green: 1999 (35% green since 1969)


21. Atlanta Braves
Position: Third base (hole score: 9)
Last green: 2013 (42% green since 1969)


22. Boston Red Sox
Position: Third base (hole score: 9)
Last green: 2012 (60% green since 1969)


23. Minnesota Twins
Position: Starting pitchers (hole score: 9)
Last green: 2011 (54% green since 1969)


24. Los Angeles Angels
Position: Left field (hole score: 7)
Last green: 2014 (25% green since 1969)


25. Cleveland Indians
Position: Center field (hole score: 7)
Last green: 2009 (44% green since 1969)


26. Toronto Blue Jays
Position: Third base (hole score: 6)
Last green: 2017 (41% green since 1969)


27. St. Louis Cardinals
Position: Starting pitchers (hole score: 5)
Last green: 1979 (17% green since 1969)


28. Oakland Athletics
Position: Second base (hole score: 4)
Last green: 2011 (37% green since 1969)


29. New York Yankees
Position: Shortstop (hole score: 3)
Last green: 2018 (63% green since 1969)


30. Los Angeles Dodgers
Position: Relief pitchers (hole score: 0)
Last green: 2020 (54% green since 1969)

--

※ PTT留言評論
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.45.165.194 (臺灣)
PTT 網址

Jinx04/27 11:50Never ==

whhw04/27 12:13洋基29...?

j0724205404/27 12:2029怎麼了嗎

jordan9080704/27 12:20天使只有左外野是洞?投手呢?

KKwilliam04/27 12:28天使以前投手有名的那麼多.....

whhw04/27 12:42我一直以為內野除了dj都很破

weitomato04/27 12:432樓不知道排名越後面洞越小嗎 還是覺得ss一直都是洞

sam959504/27 12:43運動家真猛 不像人家哪邊有洞就可以FA補

sam959504/27 12:46洋基基本上Jeter前 都沒有什麼穩定游擊吧 但一次就穩20年

catsondbs04/27 12:57Last green: Never

Nakata091104/27 13:05待會一定會有人來說Jeter都靠二三壘cover

sam959504/27 13:10沒差吧...Jeter光靠打擊就穩高於平均了

madboy04/27 13:20丁特本來就是以守備鳥爛用棒子cover聞名R

TrRosenthal04/27 14:0650年加總起來的數據不知道是能代表什麼

roserule04/27 14:56用破洞的角度來重新回想某些球隊的選秀與補強邏輯 還滿

roserule04/27 14:57滿有道理的

aborwang04/27 18:15

ChrisDavis04/27 23:07但是這是50年累積下來的數據 要怎麼回想邏輯

patlo05/02 20:48Houston : catcher

patlo05/02 20:48Brad Ausmus之外都這麼糟嗎?