PTT推薦

[專欄] Brooks出手有待加強,需要依賴其他球星

看板NBA標題[專欄] Brooks出手有待加強,需要依賴其他球星作者
usnavyseal
(usmarine2008)
時間推噓26 推:27 噓:1 →:9

Brooks出手有待加強,需要依賴其他球星
https://tinyurl.com/3zapdeuj
stadiumspeak

https://i.imgur.com/sV0yVX7.jpg

圖https://i.imgur.com/sV0yVX7.jpg?e=1667326325&s=In-8wkDMcoyFlcneR9gchQ, Brooks出手有待加強,需要依賴其他球星
Dillon Brook的進攻效率
1. 場上有2-3個球星-
2. 場上有1-2個球星
3. 場上有0個球星-只有他!

Dillon Brooks was notgood last night without Ja - taking 19 shots and missing14 of them. He’s a really trick evaluation because he’s played the same
exact role over the past 3 years as Memphis primary outside scorer (and its
been out of necessity cause this team just doesn’t have any).
And we haven’t really seen Brooks in many other contexts next to better
perimeter scoring talent. I suppose the 17.0 PPG justifies this role at firstglance, but Brooks has been horribly inefficient - 51.3% TS%.
There’s some ?s imo about how Brooks fits as a lower usage guy - his
shooting is a bit streaky and I don’t love his form, his driving off the
catch is solid but he’s not a good finisher, the decision making is not
always great… But if we look at some of his lower-usage lineups, we see a
much more efficient Dillon Brooks - especially if we go back to his rookie
year next to Conley, Tyreke, and Gasol.

在Ja Morant的缺席下,Dillon Brooks表現不佳,19投,14次失手。
評估Brooks很複雜。過去3年,他一直扮演了曼斐斯的主要外線得分手,因為球隊沒有其他人。
除了外線得分天賦外,我們還沒看到Brooks在其他情況下的表現。
乍看之下,我認為 17.0 PPG 符合他的定位,但Brooks的效率非常低 - 51.3%TS%
我覺得他的投籃很吃手感而且我不喜歡他的投籃姿勢。
他的接球切入算穩定,但他不是一個好的終結者,他的決策一直都不太好。
在過去他的一些使用率較低的陣容,我們會看到一個更有效率的Brooks,例如他新秀那年,跟Conley, Tyreke, and Gasol一起打球。


網友
It’s him to blame for the most part because he forces horrible shots
regardless of who’s playing or not
只能怪他,不管誰在場上,Brooks還是會選擇糟糕的出手。

作者
I think even in his lowest-usage contexts, Brooks is still gonna be Brooks. He’ll be more efficient, but he’s still gonna get some of his bad shots up
我認為即使在使用率最低的情況下,Brooks仍然是Brooks。 他會更有效率,但他仍然會有一些糟糕的投籃。

網友
Hes Marcus Smart with worse defense and no playmaking
他是防守更差 Marcus Smart但沒有進攻組織

作者
I think Smart is an interesting comp for Brooks. smart's a good case study ofa tough shotmaker with erratic decision-making who had to fit along other
better perimeter options (which brooks will likely have to do in the future).It doesnt bode well that Smart wasnt a firm + on offense until he had a
passing leap this year - altho brooks is a better shotcreator.

我覺得拿Smart比Brooks很有趣,Smart是典型的高難度投籃手,投籃選擇不穩定,必須配合其他更好的外線射手(Brooks 未來也需要)
這不是好兆頭「Smart的進攻並不穩定,直到他今年學到了傳球」(Brooks創造的投籃機會比較好)

--

※ PTT留言評論
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 194.5.52.209 (臺灣)
PTT 網址

chouvincent 05/11 15:42都點到揍人了吧

lsslz 05/11 15:43確實 出手選擇太拙劣 多跟嘴綠學

alexis7682 05/11 15:43猜明天Brooks爆發...

jasonis08 05/11 15:43笑死哈哈

f77928 05/11 15:44回主場就爆發了

Angel0724 05/11 15:46場上有(對方)球星時獲得buff

danson555 05/11 15:59他投籃姿勢是真的蠻微妙的….

ks96021019 05/11 15:59一出手就解放JA,跟我談出手選擇?

freshbox7 05/11 16:06可能不打人就不會打球了,慘

jonestem 05/11 16:07欸不是,他始終就不是球星啊,一開始也沒有預期他

jonestem 05/11 16:07能夠長成球星的樣子吧?要求會不會太高? ^^a

callme76 05/11 16:13不愧是聯盟門面的隊友,跟喇叭隊友一樣

KirkSynder 05/11 16:13Smart的進攻並不穩定,直到他今年學到了傳球???

callme76 05/11 16:13只有被檢討的份#單核#一神帶四坑

zyzzyvab 05/11 16:24就不是球星的料啊!

wayne4225 05/11 16:25brooks就是很不錯的先發啊 這種苦力射手蠻不錯的

KOEI56 05/11 16:34苦力射手X 殘廢射手O

kalistanm 05/11 16:47可惜對上乾淨勇

luganzhin 05/11 16:51問題就是並非最頂鋒的球星,卻有頂峰的出手數

luganzhin 05/11 16:52而且出手選擇和命中率並不好

cl3bp6 05/11 16:56出手有待加強(物理)

hiphopboy7 05/11 16:56不是吧 Brooks出手夠重了吧 還要加強嗎

NuRaymond 05/11 17:04出手有待加強 出手(傷人)有待下修

AWSMD 05/11 17:05進攻選擇真的有夠差

yuenwwjd 05/11 17:08出手選擇有待加強(選勇士當家球星來打)?

K951753 05/11 17:32選錯對象出手

abcde010710 05/11 18:01跟嘴綠學出手好嗎

therika 05/11 18:09出手(物理)選擇(生物)有待加強

sexygnome 05/11 18:11懂了,看來只能加入球星最多的勇士

kane840104 05/11 18:15明天就爆發了啦

phoenix286 05/11 18:26他就是灰熊二當家了啊

hws606 05/11 20:11今年2當家是Bane吧

answertw 05/11 21:24隨便啦 反正這季結束了 今天就隨便打 板凳全上

hiro1221 05/11 22:57但Bane第二輪也很慘平均9.5分

hiro1221 05/11 22:58勇士跟灰狼防守強度不一樣

Ten6666 05/12 00:30他就不是球星 這不是很正常嗎

eno03 05/12 08:15W DB只要都打不好 灰熊常輸球