Re: [情報] 諫山創在紐約時報專訪談巨人結局

※ 引述《rayisgreat (在過往中無盡徘徊)》之銘言：
: Eren says in the final episode of the anime that he had no choice but to
: follow the future that he saw, that he was powerless against the powers of the: Founding Titan. Armin even asks if he’s really free. Was he telling the
: truth or do you see this as him telling an excuse?
: 在動畫的最後一集中，艾倫說他別無選擇，只能遵循他所看到的未來
: 他無法抵抗始祖巨人的力量，阿爾敏甚至問他是否真的自由
: 他是在說真話，還是你認為這是他在找藉口？
: So the truth is the situation with Eren actually overlaps in a certain sense: with my own story with this manga. When I first started this series, I was
: worried that it would probably be canceled. It was a work that no one knew
: about. But I had already started the story with the ending in mind. And the: story ended up being read and watched by an incredible number of people, and: it led to me being given a huge power that I didn’t quite feel comfortable
: with.
: 所以事實上，艾倫的處境在某種意義上與我自己創作這部漫畫的故事有所重疊
: 當我剛開始這個系列時，我擔心它可能會被取消。成為一個沒有人知道的作品
: 但我已經是帶著結局開始這個故事的。而這個故事最終被無數人閱讀和觀看
: 這讓我被賦予了一種我不太舒服的巨大力量。
: It would have been nice if I could have changed the ending. Writing manga is: supposed to be freeing. But if I was completely free, then I should have been: able to change the ending. I could have changed it and said I wanted to go in: a different direction. But the fact is that I was tied down to what I had
: originally envisioned when I was young. And so, manga became a very
: restrictive art form for me, similar to how the massive powers that Eren
: acquired ended up restricting him.
: 如果我能改變結局就好了。創作漫畫應該是自由的
: 但如果我完全自由的話，那麼我應該能夠改變結局
: 我本可以改變它，說我想走一條不同的方向
: 但事實是，我被我年輕時最初構想的東西所束縛
: 因此，漫畫對我來說成為了一種非常有限制性的藝術形式
: 這與艾倫獲得的巨大力量最終限制了他相似。

這段真的是太美了~忍不住用回文的方式記錄下來

這樣就能完整了解作者筆下艾連真正的動機~而不是只能讀者腦補

是真正的腳色背景想法

也就是說艾連(艾倫)獲得能力後想幹的事情已經確定就是要自由

自由就是自由自在的毀滅世界

但因為在毀滅世界

又覺得被這個當初自由的想法給束縛住

形成一個自由悖論

如果你真的是自由的

應該想停就停~

可是這個毀滅世界的想法也是自由的

那為了執行這個毀滅世界的想法就不得不成為這個想法的奴隸

雞生蛋蛋生雞的悖論

好屌阿創哥

原來你有這層想法

--