Re: [爆卦] 倫敦大學未曾出版蔡英文博士論文

: ※ 引述《art1 (人，原來不是人)》之銘言
來
英文是你自己找的
你自己要不要翻翻看中文?
看看以下三段34/35/36中
你說的「法官看過蔡總統口委簽名文件」
的文字在哪裡?
看不懂英文的話
你可以請教讀得懂英文的人

不要再丟一些自己都看不懂的英文騙人了
感謝

: Evidence
: 34. We have read and taken account of an open and a small closed bundle of
: documents.
: 這一句叫做倫敦大學說有文件，所以駁回？
: 35. It is necessary that the documents in the closed bundle are not revealed: to Mr Richardson because to do otherwise would defeat the purpose of the
: proceedings.
: The tribunal accepts that in accordance with the guidance given by the Court: of Appeal in Browning we are required to disclose as much as possible about the
: closed bundle when writing our decision.
: 還是這一段叫做倫敦大學說有文件，所以駁回？
: 我引的段落則是下一段
: 36. In accordance with the guidance in Browning, the tribunal records that
: the closed bundle is limited to a document containing the requested information
: i.e. the names of the examiners and the date the examiners signed approval of: the thesis.
: 倫敦大學上呈證據，法官判決書寫 We read，你能解讀成法官不看文件只聽倫敦大學說
--