Re: [閒聊] 阻尼係數
阻尼因素的高低跟聽感關聯性沒有這麼絕對
真空管機沒有高的 但是管機低頻控制就都很差嗎 相信市場上反應並非這樣
以下轉貼 Sterophile 訪問Tim de Paravicini 的片段(Jun 5, 1984)
談他的EAR 509
這機器的低頻控制力速度感都十分厲害 但DF只有20
請看看他如何解釋
Stereophile: We're looking at a damping factor of only 20, right?
De Paravicini: Yes, well, it may only appear to have a damping factor of 20
but that needs to be clarified. People have latched on to the idea that
damping factor is the only important criterion for tight bass.
Now a conventional dynamic speaker is essentially an electric motor in serieswith an 8 ohm resistor inside that motor—if you measure the voice-coil
terminal it measures 8 ohms DC [(footnote 1)]. Now if you put a screwdriver
across those two terminals, you have put an infinite damping factor on that
loudspeaker, right?
Stereophile: Right.
De Paravicini: But that electric motor has still got 8 ohms in series with itto damp its motion. It hasn't really got a short circuit. Now, if instead of
the screwdriver I put an 8 ohm resistor across those terminals, that electricmotor now sees 16 ohms in a series, so in fact it's got half the damping thatit had before, which is expressed as a DF of 2. If we lower that resistor
from 8 ohms to 1, for example, we now have a damping factor of 8. That
electric motor is now seeing 9 ohms, which is only 10% larger than 8 ohms.
We're closing the gap towards that perfect 8 ohm resistor, so if we go
downwards from below 1 ohm to ½ and then ¼ ohm, we're getting ever closer
to that 8 ohm minimum. It just doesn't buy you anything, because you can't
get below 8. So if you increase the amplifier's damping factor beyond 10, theactual damping on the speaker remains for all intents and purposes unchanged.Whether you have a damping factor of 1000 or 100,000, the speaker really
doesn't know the difference.
Stereophile: Then why is it that amplifiers with very high damping factor
usually give the tightest bass?
De Paravicini: The reason amplifiers sound apparently tighter or looser is
not their damping factor but the amount and the quality of their feedback andtheir low-frequency stability under dynamic conditions. The bandwidth, the
frequency response, the way it clips, the way it recovers from clipping are
all problems that are really of great concern. They are all signatures of theamp's sound characteristics.
The ideal amplifier should recover from an overload infinitely fast and not
have any subsonic misbehavior. What I am trying to do is to come as close to
that as possible in a transformer-output tube amplifier. That is why my
amplifiers may sound as if the bass is thin—simply because there isn't this
overhang.
Most tube amplifiers cannot deliver current. They have a rated power into onerated impedance and the minute the impedance deviates significantly on eitherside of that, their power output goes to pot. I designed the 509 so it would
still maintain its rated power down to 3 ohms. It has a peak current capacity—something I don't publish in the specs but that should be mentioned—of 12
amps. That is one of the reasons for the exceptional tightness of the bass.
It can keep the speaker under control, and that's why a cheap 10W receiver
will often bottom its woofers. The amplifier loses control totally, and you
end up with a damping factor of less than 1, momentarily. From a
superficially high figure it disappears, then the speaker lets go and it goesback, crash!
--
推....因為ID正確?
推好文
id正確XDD
隨手筆記短心得:
1. Benchmark 有特別解釋DF的文章,推薦一讀。 兩篇都
主張1000、10000之類的DF意義不大。
2. 低頻和(負)回授的品質有關,和頻寬(~=瞬態)有關,
和THD vs. Power的表現有關... (os: 負回授反對派站出
來!)
3. 我家的擴大機有時候聽起來低頻比較薄(lol)(os: 所以
說DF 20太低啊...)
4. 瞬間電流輸出能力很重要 (偷嘴小功率後級www)
5. 其實這篇主要在說用DF評價機器太簡化(這是對的,正
確來說要看output impedence/power vs. frequency)
推本文與樓上
以我聽/使用過的後級來說 509的低頻表現跟大電流晶體機很像
家裡以前用的Adcom GFA555跟Bryston 8BST都贏不了他
這文前面也有提到feedback跟TIM 有興趣的可以看看
OPT 管機常常跳脫一些狀況 Q_Qb
我之前聽的 EAR 509 倒是控制不好 JBL 4343
瞬間電流能力跟線路的反應速度跟電源供應關係很大
DF根本只要100就夠用了 超過 400 根本沒意義
wilson audio 甚至在他的喇叭上面直接寫著 DF 100~400
把 DF 拉高很簡單,但會劣化音質。但提升電供很貴,但是
幾乎沒啥副作用
所以我講了 實聽最準 廠商會吹牛或會說實話 也是很正常
25
打給後,我想我做為一個多年D類高阻尼係數使用者,外加自身產品也有使用的 設計師來解惑一下大家的疑問應該是OK的吧? 歡迎討論一下,let's go ※ 引述《Dopin (bbs.bsd.com.tw)》之銘言: : 本來這東西應該算是音響比較裡面的東西 不過閒聊應該也是可以12
首Po本來這東西應該算是音響比較裡面的東西 不過閒聊應該也是可以 我在品樂聽達力小喇叭時 友人好奇問道 可不可以換擴大機或是喇叭呢 (炸) 阿益也很阿殺力 的換上了 burmaster ... 結果 ... 聲音變得超呆板 低頻好像被砍掉 60% ... 我聽了之後 問阿益說這台 的阻尼因素是多少呀 控制力頗猛耶 他歪頭想了一下 : 我只知道很高
33
[情報] McIntosh MHA200耳擴what hifi報導 麥景圖新出的MHA200是體積不大(以他們家標準來說XD)的真空管純耳擴 目前看到的美金定價約$2500,三月美國上市 之前出的MHA150是DAC一體機,比較大台也貴不少17
Re: [閒聊] 耳機的"瞬態"與耳擴的"推力"Stereophile.com 有篇把 Beyerdynamic DT 880 三兄弟拿來作範例圖文並茂的解說 有興趣可以參考一下 A Comparison of Beyerdynamic DT 880 32 ohm, DT 880 250 ohm, and DT 880 600 ohm Headphones12
[問題] Sound Blaster Z + DT770 Pro/990 Pro最近在考慮購入DT 770 Pro/990 Pro 990沒意外只有250 ohm版本可以挑 但是770 Pro 還有80 ohm版本 我打算用我電腦內的Creative Sound Blaster Z直推 想請問各位不知道有沒有經驗這張卡推不推的了250ohm?11
Re: [請益] 關於DT770 PRO與家用版差異Impedance 以下估狗翻譯劃重點,無校有疑問請參照原文 HOW DO THE IMPEDANCE VERSIONS OF THE DT 770 PRO DIFFER SOUNDWISE? support.beyerdynamic.com 有兩個版本的DT 770 PRO型號具有不同的膜和線圈。10
Re: [問題] 前級音量,主動式喇叭輸入阻抗請益?阻抗跟放不放大沒關係,跟電路特性(真空管也較高)或輸出入的 buffer 電路有關 一般希望輸出阻抗低、輸入阻抗高,這樣前級輸出的信號才會比較好的傳送到後級輸入 3.3 Output Port Connections Connect the output amplifier input to your Passive Preamplifier output, to the corresponding RCA (Red and White Ports)/XLR. Since9
Re: [問題] Altis 12代低速晃動極有可能跟原廠避震器阻尼特性有關 先從避震器的試驗設備(absorber test system)講起 試驗設備長這個樣子 目的是取得避震器行程方向在不同速度下的阻尼力2
[情報] Dirac for 2022 Denon & Marantz 環擴Dirac Roadmap for 2022 Denon & Marantz AV Products TL;DR 1. 2023/03 更新後會支援 Dirac Live room Limited and full bandwidth versions Dirac Live room Limited USD 259; full bandwidth versions USD 3591
Re: [請益] 資產配置各國比例問題2018的某人的碩士論文 << Outperforming the Global Market Portfolio with GDP-weighting? A Matter of Factor Exposures>> ==========================================================