Re: [問卦]倫敦政經學院的判決是真的嗎?
※ 引述《Doombringer (道不遠人~)》之銘言:
: 如果這個是真的 是不是還彭文正公道了
: 英國高等行政法院裁定:
: 倫敦政經學院在蔡英文論文門醜聞中違反了自由資訊流通法案!
: 英國高等行政法院命令倫敦政經學院須在28天內透露醜聞實情!
: 英國高等行政法院也裁定:
: 1.蔡英文的論文根本不存在!
: 2.蔡英文的兩位口試委員是蔡英文自記瞎扳捏造出來的!
: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qdWVClQoijY
相關判決連結:
我似乎沒有找到另一個上訴人是Michael Richardson而且在2022的判決
Conclusion
22. The Decision Notice concluded on the balance of probabilities that LSE didnot hold the requested information. The Tribunal has had the benefit of
additional evidence provided by the Appellant and by LSE itself with its
submissions.
需要探討的是LSE的確有機率是並不持有這些被要求的資訊的(蔡的論文)
23. We conclude on the basis of all the evidence before us and on the balanceof probabilities that information within the scope of the request is held by
LSE in President Tsai’s student file. That information has been referred to inemail correspondence between LSE and others (including apparently being
supplied to a judicial inquiry) and is also referred to in its submission to
the Tribunal.
We understand that LSE doubts the accuracy of this information, but we
conclude that this is not a basis for stating that information is not held
under FOIA.
24. It may be that exemptions will be claimed, but we conclude that LSE must
now issue a fresh response in which that issue is addressed. As we have
concluded that information is held, the correct course is for LSE to issue a
fresh response on the basis that information within the scope of the request
is held, and at that stage either disclose the requested information (with
contextual commentary, if necessary) or claim any exemptions to disclosure
that it considers apply. If the Appellant disagrees with that response, he maycomplain to the Information Commissioner. The Tribunal may only become
involved if a further Decision Notice is issued.
25. We allow this appeal on the basis of the Appellant’s first ground of
appeal,
that the Decision Notice was erroneous in its conclusion that information wasnot held.
26. As to the Appellant’s second ground of appeal, we note that President
Tsai
may only give permission to disclose her own personal data and may not
override the privacy rights of third parties. In any event, this Tribunal maynot
determine the applicability of exemptions which have not yet been claimed
and have not been considered in a Decision Notice.
27. As to the Appellant’s third ground, this Tribunal’s jurisdiction
extends only
to considering the Decision Notice. It is not our role to comment on LSE’s
handling of the request.
28. We now allow the appeal and make the substituted Decision Notice above.
換句話說,這份裁定是說
上訴人第一個主張-LSE持有蔡英文的資料,應根據法規揭露
法院認可了LSE 可能持有蔡英文的相關資料
第二個主張,法院認為蔡英文可以在不違反第三者隱私權的狀況下僅許可揭露其個人資料而在Decision Notice中沒有討論到的部分法院無法決定
第三個主張,法院的裁量權僅及於Decision Notice,而無法對LSE如何回應(上訴人)請求做出評論
基於此,法院作出如上(如下)裁定:
A. The Tribunal finds that Decision Notice IC-109451-SIM2 dated 26
November 2021 was erroneous and that information within the scope of
the information request is held by LSE;
B. LSE must within 28 days issue a fresh response to the Appellant’s originalinformation request which confirms that information within the scope of
his request is held and either disclose it or claim any exemptions to
disclosure on which it relies.
A:法院發現2021的DN有誤,題述資訊由LSE持有
B:LSE應在28天內回應原始的資訊請求,要不就是揭露,要不就是提出任何豁免主張。
那如果從那時到現在4個月,LSE要不就是已經揭露,或是它真的不需要揭露XDDD
這個六月份的裁定中從頭到尾沒有說蔡的論文不存在耶
--
質疑蔡學位的就是找致命一擊的證據 就和
推啊,不能只有我看到
現在選舉打高虹安助理費一樣 也是找不到
致命的一擊
找不到 第一行漏字
找不著是因為被藏起來,如果這是真的,
就藏不住了,大場面啊
蔡的問題跟高根本不一樣
論文門基本上就論文別封存就好了
高那個每天都亂爆 直接進司法 最好一樣
個人認為蔡英文没博士論文,高虹安助理
費也是違法。
觀望
蔡的論文沒問題的話為何不敢公布?論
文案燒成這樣,作為表率不拿出來讓大
家檢視?
不是已經放在國家圖書館了?4%都沒在看?
正正當當的何必封存
你去問馬英九他肯定直接拿給你看
個人曠世巨作有人要看還不拿出來
馬的一個論文證明到底存不存在 合不合
法 到底有啥困難
隨便拿論文放國圖不代表LSE有那論文
無能?無知?腦霧?都幾?誠信問題懂嗎?
亂下什麼結論帶風向,上訴標的不是論文
是要求LSE揭露EE學位考試的資料
LSE聲稱EE整個學位考試過程都是個人隱私
"她怎麼拿到學位的"是秘密懂不懂
還在妄想有封存喔…
考試資料在倫敦大學啊,這在去年九月的法
院判決就確定了。
爆
Re: [爆卦] ICO關於LSE的論文門裁定全文公告上網原文43 Decision (including any steps ordered) 決議 1. The complainant has requested the names of the examiners who examined the then-Miss Tsai Ing-wen (now President of Taiwan) for her爆
[情報] LoL Esports Twitter 茂安世界賽禁賽Competitive Ruling: Chien "Maoan" Mao-An During the 2021 World Championship, Maoan violated Rule 9.3 of the 2021 World Championship Ruleset, which prohibits association with gambling. Competitive爆
[爆卦] ICO關於LSE的論文門裁定全文公告上網比較有趣的是 16.The LSE accepted that it did still retain President Tsai’s student record, but that that record only dealt with her activities at the LSE – and this did not include details of her final examination or viva.爆
[爆卦] LSE違反行政法院判決不願公布蔡口委來源: 彭臉書 (英行政法院發函) 前情提要: 英國行政法院法官McKenna認為倫敦大學違反了資訊自由法, 判決要求LSE在28天內(7/19前)提供蔡總統的博士口委名單 目前狀況: 28天已過, LSE無視法官要求, 未做任何回應爆
[爆卦]英國行政法院判決LSE應在28天內公布蔡口委來源: 文長 挑重點翻一下 " "當中的文字屬於判決書內容 Information Review Tribunal Judge Alison McKenna overturned the Information Commissioner and found that the London School of Economics violated the Freedom39
Re: [爆卦] ICO關於LSE的論文門裁定全文公告上網最新判決懶人包 LSE正式否決倫敦大學所提供的口試委員, 並認為當時幾乎不可能有那場口試 詳見判決書第17點36
Re: [討論] 請問論文抄襲鼻祖EE,要拿出正本了嗎!?胡攪瞎纏 LSE statement on PhD of Dr Tsai Ing-wen LSE has received a number of queries regarding the academic status of our alumna, Dr Tsai Ing-wen, President of Taiwan.35
[爆卦] LSE以個資及壓力為由不願公布蔡口委來源: 前情提要: 英國行政法院法官McKenna認為倫敦大學違反了資訊自由法, 判決要求LSE在28天內(7/19前)提供蔡總統的博士口委名單 目前狀況: LSE無視法官要求至7/31都未回應,於8/1終於回覆,仍以個資及壓力為由不願 公布蔡口委13
Re: [爆卦] ICO關於LSE的論文門裁定全文公告上網這篇敗訴理由好像沒有人講 裡面講了 判決理由指出,賀德芬請求教育部提供蔡英文的履歷及學位證書部分,教育部已在訴訟程 序進行期間,於今年6月3日將相關文書送達,此部分已滿足賀德芬請求,無再提供權利保3
[黑特] 英國高等法院:FOIA不適用蔡英文論文資訊來自Richardson的部落格 英國Upper Tribunal的法官Edward Jacobs駁回一項引用FOIA(資訊自由法)來討論。 判決認定FOIA並不適用此案件。 文中還有提到:
94
[問卦] 其實身邊去日本自助旅行的人不多?75
[問卦] 貓貓節育後 只能望梅止渴?35
[問卦] 全台跳電頻頻,備轉率失真淪美化37
[問卦] 用過3.5磁片跟5.25磁片的都幾歲了阿?79
[問卦] YT上面為什麼很少台灣說書人、講評頻道39
[問卦] 菲律賓到底出了什麼問題47
Re: [新聞] 創意私房轉移陣地?傳Telegram也淪陷 衛15
[問卦] 某個俄國的臉書社團……66
[問卦] 泰國觀光是怎麼贏台灣的啊26
[問卦] 便宜的布洛芬怎麼買?26
[問卦] 跳電自己準備小柴油發電機推薦?22
[問卦] 李多慧裙子飛起來了25
[問卦] 如何殺死蚊子27
[問卦] 台灣現在主流文化是8+9文化嗎?67
[問卦] 停電有什麼比較文雅的說法嗎?62
[爆卦] 台北中山區停電?21
[問卦] 任意險不給線上投保了該怎麼辦?20
[問卦] Don’t look up 如果翻拍要取什麼片名?17
[爆卦] 大谷翔平雙響砲 並列聯盟全壘打王17
[問卦] 考上衛道國中部,等於拿到考上台中一中16
[問卦] 黑熊部隊和海豹部隊誰比較強?38
[問卦] 要怎麼釋懷阿公生前所說的話?14
[問卦] 只有我發現 剛剛宜蘭電力不穩嗎?14
[問卦] 月收不到70,000的人為什麼不去開公車?16
[問卦] 廟會芋頭 去跳啦啦隊可以當Ace嗎?14
[問卦] Energy 簽名要排多久14
[問卦] 維他命C發泡錠到底是給誰用的?32
[問卦] 自助仔是不是都看不起跟團仔13
[問卦] 蘭嶼的飛魚,做一夜干或乾貨有搞頭嗎?11
Re: [新聞] 列貪污被告! 柯文哲急發「1102字文長慎入